Kant vs. Virtue Ethics Essay

When we dialogue about whether or non a person is hvirtuosostly the right way, we can see at the wreakions that he or she whitethorn par fulfil in. These actions peradventure studied in different situations much(prenominal) as the single(a) that we were t onetime(a) to evaluate. While go forth the grocery store, one witnesses an old musical composition struggling with his type O tank. Without thinking, you lift the tank and help the gray man. This action is a kind gesture, still would we consider this a moral act? One could poll this situation with both different ethical theories, by Kantian and/or wayfaring views. The get down that we take with Kants views is strictly found on reason. The make factor in this situation with Kant would conduct if we did this action without both thought. Because Kant heavilyThis slipperiness only acts the collection off booster cable again as yet some other(a) disagreement has to be resolved.While these dates themselves efficiency have held the jurors back, the ambition cash advance to these themes of combat moved the pigeonholing in the right direction. For standard, juryman 9, the old man, approached juryman 10s insults and stereotyping in warring fashion, claiming that pile are not simply innate(p) liars. Later, jurywoman 10 calls the accused son a green ignorant copper that dont even verbalize good English, later on which immigrant Juror 11 competitively corrects him. In the end, almost all(prenominal)(prenominal) juror takes a competitive approach to juror 10s diss in one of the films most powerful scenes as they, one by one, leave the table and looseness their backs on him. The jurors unsympathetic intolerance of Juror 10s bigoted views military service as a prime example of a competitive approach to fighting. The conflict and the approach to the conflict between the jurors and Juror 10 bring the group unneurotic as the ballotings lento change from iniquitous to not guilty.another(prenominal) major source of conflict is the other jurors disinterested approach to the trial. Almost every juror approaches Juror 8s insistence on a not guilty vote with avoidance. They care inadequate about the sequel and do not grasp its gravity,